Nixeny Dijital - Mersin / Trade Geography 2026
Half of the 19,615 businesses in Mersin included in this study fit into 23 km² — five percent of the 462.75 km² that holds any business at all. One question: where does trade in Mersin actually stand?
What this map shows and what it does not
The density on the map is not “where the businesses in Mersin are” but “where the businesses in this sample are”: 72 business types × 13 districts of queries, equal effort per district. The accurate phrasing is “the Mersin businesses included in this study”.
The denominator of every density number is the total area of the 500 m cells that group actually put a business in. The province's area is never used. The sentence “42 businesses per square kilometre” is true not of Mersin but of the 462.75 km² of Mersin that holds trade.
The coordinates are the point Google gives for a business; for some, that point is not the front door but the centre of a complex or a shopping centre. The median neighbour distance is therefore a floor, and should be read as “same building or next door”.
This study is one moment in time. It describes where the clusters are; it does not measure whether they are growing. The relationship between distance from the core and digital presence is also a relationship; section 10 sets out why it is not causation.
Glossary · every term explained once
- Trade geography
- The subject of this report: where businesses stand within the province and how uneven that standing is. What is measured is location; not turnover, employment or economic size.
- Base
- This report uses four separate bases: 19,615 businesses, 1,851 occupied grid cells, 1,997 trade clusters and the 226 cells a rate is calculated over. Every rate names which one it is over.
- Grid cell
- A square 500 metres on a side. The province is divided into a grid derived from where the businesses are; a square with no business in it enters no calculation in this study.
- Footprint
- The total area of the cells a group put a business in. Every density denominator in this report is a footprint — never a district's administrative area. Administrative area data enters this study nowhere.
- Trade core
- The centroid of the block made of the 500 m cell with the highest business count and its eight neighbours. It is not an administrative centre, a town hall or a “city centre”; it is the densest block in the sample.
- Hotspot
- The cells in the top 1% by business count. The threshold in this study is 138 businesses; 19 cells pass it.
- Gini coefficient
- Summarises how unequally a resource is distributed, between 0 and 1. The resource measured here is businesses and the side it is distributed across is the occupied grid cells: 0 means an equal number in every cell, 1 means all of them in one.
- Nearest-neighbour index (Clark-Evans R)
- How tightly a sector's points sit compared with the distance expected if they were scattered at random inside its own convex hull. R < 1 is clustered, R ≈ 1 random, R > 1 dispersed. The edge effect pulls R slightly upward, which works against the clustering claim; no correction was applied.
- Moran's I
- Measures whether neighbouring cells resemble one another. A value near zero means “being side by side says nothing”; a positive value means “similar cells stand together”.
- Principal axis (PCA)
- The first principal component of the business points: the direction in which the distribution is widest. In Mersin that direction coincides with the coastline, but it is not coastline data — it falls out of the distribution itself.
- Single-link clustering
- The rule that puts businesses within 150 metres of one another in the same cluster. It chains: if A and B are neighbours and B and C are neighbours, all three are in one cluster even if A and C are kilometres apart. That is why every cluster's span is published too.
- Cluster span
- The largest distance between any two businesses in a cluster. A cluster a few hundred metres across is a bazaar; one ten kilometres across is a town. It is the number to read before naming a cluster.
- Isolated business
- A business with no other business within a 1,000 metre radius. It is a definition of distance, not a measure of success.
- Standard distance
- How far a group's businesses spread, on average, from their own centroid. The standard deviation of geography.
- Spearman rank correlation
- Summarises whether two rankings move together, between −1 and +1. A value near zero means the two measures do not predict one another.
- Own website
- That the address on the business's Google profile is an independent domain rather than a platform page. The definition comes from the Mersin / State of Digital 2026 study.
A map of Mersin's trade, with nothing traced
There is not one boundary line on the map below. The shape of Mersin is a by-product of where the businesses are: each square is 500 metres of ground, and as dark as the number of businesses in it. Coastline, district borders, the road network and population data entered this study nowhere.
Each square is 500 metres. The ink is logarithmic: the densest cell holds 398 businesses and the median cell 2; a linear scale would show the whole province as empty. The 19 red-outlined squares are the cells above the hotspot threshold (138 businesses).
The first thing the map says is an absence. Of the 18,989 km² the businesses span, only 462.75 km² — 2.4% — holds at least one business. The rest is, as far as this sample goes, entirely empty. That does not mean “there is no trade there”; it means “none of these 72 business types is there”.
Ordered by the number of businesses in the cell. The base of the own-site share is the cell's own business count, not the province total.
| # | District | Businesses | Most common type | Own site | To core |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Akdeniz | 398 | Customs brokerage 38 | 34.2% | 0.4 km |
| 2 | Mut | 340 | Clothing shop 36 | 7.7% | 107.5 km |
| 3 | Erdemli | 295 | Jeweller 29 | 14.9% | 35.4 km |
| 4 | Tarsus | 281 | Jeweller 35 | 17.1% | 27.1 km |
| 5 | Silifke | 259 | Lawyer 29 | 13.9% | 78.4 km |
| 6 | Tarsus | 256 | Lawyer 30 | 18.4% | 26.7 km |
| 7 | Anamur | 250 | Clothing shop 26 | 12.8% | 179.7 km |
| 8 | Akdeniz | 236 | Phone / electronics shop 24 | 30.5% | 0.2 km |
| 9 | Silifke | 229 | Café 20 | 20.5% | 78.0 km |
| 10 | Akdeniz | 206 | Jeweller 24 | 25.2% | 0.6 km |
| 11 | Erdemli | 196 | Lawyer 20 | 17.9% | 35.8 km |
| 12 | Silifke | 184 | Hairdresser / barber 18 | 8.7% | 77.7 km |
| 13 | Yenişehir | 182 | Hairdresser / barber 15 | 26.4% | 3.3 km |
| 14 | Yenişehir | 178 | Dental clinic 12 | 39.3% | 3.7 km |
| 15 | Yenişehir | 149 | Tutoring centre 13 | 43.0% | 4.2 km |
| 16 | Akdeniz | 146 | International shipping / freight forwarder 15 | 37.7% | 0.6 km |
| 17 | Akdeniz | 145 | Accountant 14 | 30.3% | 0.5 km |
| 18 | Yenişehir | 143 | Tutoring centre 13 | 51.8% | 4.0 km |
| 19 | Akdeniz | 138 | Lawyer 35 | 32.6% | 0.8 km |
| 20 | Silifke | 136 | Air-conditioning service 11 | 14.0% | 77.3 km |
Half the trade fits into 23 km²
Half the businesses stand in 92 cells — 5.0% of the occupied cells, 23 km² in all. The median cell holds 2 businesses; the densest holds 398.
The horizontal axis is the cumulative share of occupied cells, sparsest first. The vertical is the cumulative share of the businesses in them. The diagonal is what an equal number of businesses in every cell would look like.
A hotspot is a cell in the top 1% by business count; the threshold is 138 businesses. The two rows' area share and business share come from different denominators, and both are written on every row.
“Trade in Mersin gathers into 2.4% of the area the businesses span; and only 1.0% of that area holds 21.5% of the businesses.” Both denominators in that sentence are written down, and neither of them is the province’s area.
A single corridor: 243 kilometres
97.0% of the variance in the business distribution is explained by a single direction. The standard deviation of the spread perpendicular to it is only 10.4 km; along it, 59.1 km. Mersin’s trade is laid out not over an area but along a line.
The red line is the first principal component of the business coordinates: the direction in which the distribution is widest. The bands around it are strips at ±1, ±2, ±5 and ±10 km perpendicular distance.
Five bands by perpendicular distance from the axis. Every row's share is over the province's total business count.
As you move out from the core
In the ring within 1 km of the trade core there are 354 businesses per square kilometre. At 50 km and beyond, 31. But that outer ring holds 27.8% of the businesses — the density falls, the mass does not.
Two frames. On the left the 25 and 50 km rings at provincial scale; on the right the 24 km of detail around the core, on the same grid, with the 1, 2, 5 and 10 km rings. At provincial scale a 1 km radius is four pixels — and that is exactly the finding.
The dot shows the share of businesses; the number on the right is the businesses per square kilometre of that ring's footprint. Two numbers on one row, and not on the same scale.
1,997 trade clusters, half the businesses in three
Putting businesses within 150 metres of one another in the same cluster gives 1,997 separate trade clusters. 1,325 of them (66.4%) hold a single business. The largest holds 7,864.
The circle's area is proportional to the number of businesses in the cluster — not its radius. The circle sits on the cluster's centroid; the cluster's real shape is the grid beneath it.
Two rates per row: on the left that bucket's share of all clusters, on the right its businesses' share of all businesses. Two separate bases, two separate bars.
The span is the largest distance between any two businesses in the cluster. It is the column to read before naming anything.
| # | District | Businesses | Types | Span | Own site |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yenişehir | 7,864 | 72 | 18.2 km | 31.9% |
| 2 | Tarsus | 1,564 | 68 | 4.0 km | 18.0% |
| 3 | Silifke | 1,206 | 66 | 2.7 km | 14.2% |
| 4 | Erdemli | 1,072 | 67 | 3.8 km | 17.4% |
| 5 | Anamur | 953 | 61 | 3.1 km | 14.5% |
| 6 | Mut | 690 | 64 | 3.1 km | 7.5% |
| 7 | Bozyazı | 335 | 52 | 2.4 km | 9.8% |
| 8 | Gülnar | 148 | 45 | 1.0 km | 8.1% |
| 9 | Silifke | 136 | 34 | 1.2 km | 19.9% |
| 10 | Tarsus | 135 | 42 | 2.1 km | 17.8% |
The same data under three different neighbourhood rules. The published value is 150 metres; the other two are here to show how much that value decides.
A median 18 metres to a neighbour; a kilometre for 190
The median distance from a business in Mersin to its nearest neighbouring business is 18 metres. Scattered at random it would have averaged 492 metres; in fact it is 72.8 metres.
That figure is a floor and should be read as one. For some businesses Google Places gives not the front door but the centre point of a complex or a shopping centre; businesses in the same building can therefore appear at nearly zero distance. The right reading is “same building or next door”, not a metre-by-metre measurement.
The distance to the nearest other business of any type. The base is 19,614: one business's neighbour distance could not be measured and was dropped from the base rather than counted as zero. The last two buckets are businesses with almost nobody around them.
Businesses with no neighbour at all within a 1,000 metre radius. Every row's base is that district's own business count.
Which trade leans on which
Not every business type clusters the same way. Psychologists lean on one another (R = 0.076), customs brokers look almost randomly scattered (R = 0.844) — but the second is not dispersion, it is being squeezed into a single district: 88.4% of customs brokers are in Akdeniz.
Each tick is one business type. R is the ratio to the neighbour distance expected under complete spatial randomness inside that sector's own convex hull. The tick height carries no data; it only keeps values that land side by side countable.
The red dot is the average neighbour distance expected under a random distribution, the blue dot the observed one. The distance between them is the clustering itself.
Median metres, the closest fourteen first. This is a distance, not a rate; the axis is in metres.
Every row's base is that business type's own business count. The red line is the province-wide figure: 21.5% of businesses are in hotspot cells.
Digital presence clusters spatially
The share of businesses with their own website is not scattered randomly across the map: neighbouring cells hold similar shares. That means knowing one cell’s share carries information about its neighbour’s — and says nothing at all about why.
The ink on this map is red and Figure 01's is blue — deliberately. That map paints a count, this one a rate; if the two ramps were the same, a dense cell would read as a digital one. The pale grey ground is the 1,625 cells no rate could be calculated for.
Each circle is a cell; its size is the number of businesses in it. The horizontal axis is logarithmic, because half the cells sit within 10 km.
The same 226 cells, this time against density rather than distance. The horizontal axis is logarithmic again.
Every row's base is that ring's own business count. The red line is the province-wide figure: 24.3%.
29.7 points between Yenişehir and Çamlıyayla
The largest difference between districts is not in density but in digital presence. Between the densest and the sparsest district there is a factor of 7.1 in businesses per square kilometre of footprint; in the own-website share the gap is 29.7 percentage points.
Every row's base is that district's own business count. The 130 businesses whose district could not be assigned are outside this figure.
The density denominator is the footprint: the total area of the 500 m cells that district put a business in. Administrative area was never used in this study.
| District | Businesses | Share | Footprint | / km² | Spread | To core |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yenişehir | 3,393 | 17.3% | 39.75 km² | 85.4 | 2.2 km | 4.4 km |
| Akdeniz | 2,739 | 14.0% | 70.50 km² | 38.9 | 6.2 km | 1.0 km |
| Tarsus | 2,587 | 13.2% | 69.50 km² | 37.2 | 5.7 km | 26.7 km |
| Silifke | 2,057 | 10.5% | 58.25 km² | 35.3 | 11.8 km | 77.9 km |
| Mezitli | 1,909 | 9.7% | 37.25 km² | 51.2 | 2.9 km | 10.1 km |
| Erdemli | 1,654 | 8.4% | 57.00 km² | 29.0 | 8.4 km | 35.6 km |
| Toroslar | 1,493 | 7.6% | 51.25 km² | 29.1 | 4.0 km | 3.0 km |
| Anamur | 1,322 | 6.7% | 29.25 km² | 45.2 | 31.9 km | 179.3 km |
| Mut | 961 | 4.9% | 31.75 km² | 30.3 | 12.8 km | 107.5 km |
| Bozyazı | 512 | 2.6% | 25.50 km² | 20.1 | 28.1 km | 166.8 km |
| Gülnar | 370 | 1.9% | 26.75 km² | 13.8 | 28.3 km | 121.0 km |
| Aydıncık | 249 | 1.3% | 12.25 km² | 20.3 | 20.4 km | 135.9 km |
| Çamlıyayla | 239 | 1.2% | 19.75 km² | 12.1 | 7.2 km | 40.7 km |
Not one density number in this table was divided by a district’s administrative area. Had we done that, we would have shown the difference between Çamlıyayla and Yenişehir as hundreds of times larger, and what we measured would not be trade but where the district boundaries happen to run.
A map does not show causation
This report’s strongest-looking finding is also its most easily misread: as you move away from the core, the share of businesses with their own website falls. The rank correlation is -0.539 and the gap between the first and last ring is 17.5 points. That is a relationship.
The same pattern is produced by the composition of sectors alone, even if distance had no effect at all. In the centre there are lawyers, accountants and customs brokers; in the countryside car washes and tyre shops. Those two groups already differ in website ownership. Separating how much each carries would need the same businesses on two different dates, or a comparison holding sector constant; this study has neither.
- That trade is squeezed into a very small part of the area the businesses span, and that this squeeze can be measured with the Gini, the Lorenz curve and the hotspot share.
- That 97% of the variance in the business distribution is explained by a single direction, and that this direction falls out of the data itself.
- That sectors separate spatially: the gap between the most clustered and the most dispersed business type is more than tenfold.
- That the share of businesses with their own website is not spatially random; neighbouring cells hold similar shares.
- That distance from the core lowers digital presence — a single cross-section tests no causation, and the composition of sectors produces the same pattern.
- That the clusters have grown over time or that the core has shifted — that needs panel data.
- That an empty cell means there is no trade there — the sample is limited to 72 business types.
- That the densest block is “Mersin's commercial centre” — that is a sampling definition, not an administrative one.
Limitations
- A single cross-section cannot measure growth.
- Whether the clusters have grown over time, or whether the core has shifted, cannot be tested with this data. A repeat of the study will produce the panel data that can measure it.
- The sample is limited to 72 business types.
- A cluster of a sector outside the scope does not appear on the map at all. An empty cell does not mean “there is no trade there”; it means “none of these 72 types is there”.
- Dense areas may be saturated.
- Places Text Search returns at most 60 results per query. In very dense areas the coverage is cut at that limit, which understates density — so the densest cells may be denser than what is written here.
- Coordinate precision varies from business to business.
- Businesses inside a shopping centre or an office block can fall on a single centre point. That pulls the nearest-neighbour distances down and makes differences under 100 metres uninterpretable.
- The clusters have no names.
- The clusters carry no neighbourhood or bazaar name. The largest are formed by chaining and represent not a bazaar but the unbroken trade fabric of a district centre; any naming must be verified by hand.
- A convex hull is not a density denominator.
- Google's district field misfiles a few businesses per district — a mobile roadside-assistance listing registered to Akdeniz appears 150 km west along the coast. A single point like that multiplies the hull tenfold; it adds one cell to the footprint. The hull appears in this report only as an indicator of spread.
- District shares are not economic shares.
- Because the same query effort was spent in every district, these numbers measure shares of the businesses in the sample, not the economic size of the districts.
- The distance-to-digital relationship is not causation.
- That the share of businesses with their own site falls as you move away from the centre does not show that distance lowers digital presence. The composition of sectors produces the same pattern: lawyers and customs brokers in the centre, car washes in the countryside.
Citation rules
These six rules are not a matter of style. Each is here because breaking it changes what the number means.
- 01Density is always given with an explicit denominator; the province's area is never used.
- 02Do not say “Mersin's commercial centre”; say “the densest trade block in the sample”.
- 03The relationship between distance and digital presence is a relationship; no causation is claimed.
- 04When districts are compared the base is that district's business footprint; it is neither its administrative area nor its convex hull.
- 05Differences in distance under 100 metres are not interpreted; a Places coordinate is not building-precise.
- 06The clusters carry no neighbourhood or bazaar name; any naming must be verified by hand.
The method, briefly
- 01UniverseThe data set of the Mersin / State of Digital 2026 study: the 19,615 local businesses visible as active on Google and carrying a coordinate. There is no record without a coordinate; coverage is 100%.
- 02ProjectionA local plane projection (plate carrée), origin 36.668 / 34.292. All distances are in metres. Published distances are calculated with the haversine formula; the grid and the clustering use plane distance.
- 03The gridA square grid 500 m on a side. The density denominator is the area of the occupied cells alone; Mersin's area enters no calculation. The hotspot threshold is the top 1% of businesses per cell: 138 businesses.
- 04Clustering150 m single-link clustering. Single-business clusters are not counted as “noise” but reported as clusters of their own. Results for half the radius (75 m) and twice it (300 m) are published in Figure 12.
- 05Sector thresholdSector comparisons are limited to the 68 business types in the study's own “headline” tier. Sectors with fewer points appear in the distribution figures but never become a headline at either end.
- 06District assignmentThe administrative_area_level_2 field in Google's address components. The 130 records that could not be assigned were not estimated; they were kept in a bucket of their own, outside the district tables.
Sources
- 01Google Places API (New) business profilesThe primary data source; name, address, coordinates, primary type (primaryType), business status and the website field. Fieldwork 2026·08·25. No extra API call was made for this report; every map was produced from the existing coordinates.developers.google.com
- 02Nixeny Dijital · Mersin / State of Digital 2026The same universe, the same field date. The 19,615-business base, the district assignment and the definition of “own website” this report uses come from that study. There, location was an auxiliary field; here it is the subject itself.nixeny.com
- 03External geodata: noneThis is not a source but the absence of one, and it stands here because it changes how the report is read. Population, district area, coastline and the road network do not enter this study. The silhouette of Mersin on the maps was not drawn; it is a by-product of where the businesses are.
- 04The formulas usedGini: 2·Σ(i·xᵢ)/(n·Σx) − (n+1)/n over the ascending vector. Lorenz: 101 cumulative points in 1% steps. Clark-Evans: the ratio of the observed mean nearest-neighbour distance to the value expected under complete spatial randomness inside the sector's own convex hull. Moran's I: queen contiguity over the occupied cells. Principal axis: the first principal component of the coordinates. Clustering: 150 m single-link, plane distance.
No area, distance or density calculation in this report was compared against an external map layer. An axis that coincides with the coastline is a finding as long as it is not verified against coastline data; verify it and it becomes a circle. All that is shared with Mersin / State of Digital 2026 is the universe and the field date.
Colophon
Conducted and published by Nixeny Dijital, Mersin. Data collection, projection, spatial statistics, map production and report design are Nixeny’s own. The universe and the digital presence classification are shared with the Mersin / State of Digital 2026 study. The maps are produced on the server for this page; no map service and no external layer is used.
The method, the raw data sets, the grid file and the verification records are shared on request. For corrections and questions: info@nixeny.com