Nixeny DijitalMersin Trade Geography 2026 · August 27, 2026 · nixeny.com
Research report · 03 / 2026

Nixeny Dijital - Mersin / Trade Geography 2026

Half of the 19,615 businesses in Mersin included in this study fit into 23 km² — five percent of the 462.75 km² that holds any business at all. One question: where does trade in Mersin actually stand?

23 km²
the area half the businesses fit into
92 cells
21.5%
of businesses sit in the 19 cells covering 1% of the occupied area
4.75 km²
0.759
Gini coefficient of the distribution across cells
n = 1,851
Fieldwork 2026·08·25 · Published 2026·08·27 · Nixeny Dijital · nixeny.com
00

What this map shows and what it does not

Four notes · each of them a limit
01 · The map is not a census

The density on the map is not “where the businesses in Mersin are” but “where the businesses in this sample are”: 72 business types × 13 districts of queries, equal effort per district. The accurate phrasing is “the Mersin businesses included in this study”.

02 · The base is area, not the province

The denominator of every density number is the total area of the 500 m cells that group actually put a business in. The province's area is never used. The sentence “42 businesses per square kilometre” is true not of Mersin but of the 462.75 km² of Mersin that holds trade.

03 · Under 100 metres is not readable

The coordinates are the point Google gives for a business; for some, that point is not the front door but the centre of a complex or a shopping centre. The median neighbour distance is therefore a floor, and should be read as “same building or next door”.

04 · A single cross-section

This study is one moment in time. It describes where the clusters are; it does not measure whether they are growing. The relationship between distance from the core and digital presence is also a relationship; section 10 sets out why it is not causation.

Glossary · every term explained once

Trade geography
The subject of this report: where businesses stand within the province and how uneven that standing is. What is measured is location; not turnover, employment or economic size.
Base
This report uses four separate bases: 19,615 businesses, 1,851 occupied grid cells, 1,997 trade clusters and the 226 cells a rate is calculated over. Every rate names which one it is over.
Grid cell
A square 500 metres on a side. The province is divided into a grid derived from where the businesses are; a square with no business in it enters no calculation in this study.
Footprint
The total area of the cells a group put a business in. Every density denominator in this report is a footprint — never a district's administrative area. Administrative area data enters this study nowhere.
Trade core
The centroid of the block made of the 500 m cell with the highest business count and its eight neighbours. It is not an administrative centre, a town hall or a “city centre”; it is the densest block in the sample.
Hotspot
The cells in the top 1% by business count. The threshold in this study is 138 businesses; 19 cells pass it.
Gini coefficient
Summarises how unequally a resource is distributed, between 0 and 1. The resource measured here is businesses and the side it is distributed across is the occupied grid cells: 0 means an equal number in every cell, 1 means all of them in one.
Nearest-neighbour index (Clark-Evans R)
How tightly a sector's points sit compared with the distance expected if they were scattered at random inside its own convex hull. R < 1 is clustered, R ≈ 1 random, R > 1 dispersed. The edge effect pulls R slightly upward, which works against the clustering claim; no correction was applied.
Moran's I
Measures whether neighbouring cells resemble one another. A value near zero means “being side by side says nothing”; a positive value means “similar cells stand together”.
Principal axis (PCA)
The first principal component of the business points: the direction in which the distribution is widest. In Mersin that direction coincides with the coastline, but it is not coastline data — it falls out of the distribution itself.
Single-link clustering
The rule that puts businesses within 150 metres of one another in the same cluster. It chains: if A and B are neighbours and B and C are neighbours, all three are in one cluster even if A and C are kilometres apart. That is why every cluster's span is published too.
Cluster span
The largest distance between any two businesses in a cluster. A cluster a few hundred metres across is a bazaar; one ten kilometres across is a town. It is the number to read before naming a cluster.
Isolated business
A business with no other business within a 1,000 metre radius. It is a definition of distance, not a measure of success.
Standard distance
How far a group's businesses spread, on average, from their own centroid. The standard deviation of geography.
Spearman rank correlation
Summarises whether two rankings move together, between −1 and +1. A value near zero means the two measures do not predict one another.
Own website
That the address on the business's Google profile is an independent domain rather than a platform page. The definition comes from the Mersin / State of Digital 2026 study.
01

A map of Mersin's trade, with nothing traced

19,615 businesses · 1,851 occupied cells · no external geodata

There is not one boundary line on the map below. The shape of Mersin is a by-product of where the businesses are: each square is 500 metres of ground, and as dark as the number of businesses in it. Coastline, district borders, the road network and population data entered this study nowhere.

Figure 01 · Trade density
n = 19,615 businesses · 1,851 cells

Each square is 500 metres. The ink is logarithmic: the densest cell holds 398 businesses and the median cell 2; a linear scale would show the whole province as empty. The 19 red-outlined squares are the cells above the hotspot threshold (138 businesses).

Trade core25 kmK ↑
The trade core is the centroid of the block made of the cell with the highest business count and its eight neighbours — not an administrative centre. That block holds 1,438 businesses, 7.3% of the sample, in an area of 2.25 km².
Sparse cell (1-5 businesses)
Dense cell (100+ businesses)
Hotspot (138+ businesses)

The first thing the map says is an absence. Of the 18,989 km² the businesses span, only 462.75 km² — 2.4% — holds at least one business. The rest is, as far as this sample goes, entirely empty. That does not mean “there is no trade there”; it means “none of these 72 business types is there”.

Across the occupied cells there are 42.4 businesses per square kilometre. Divided by the province’s area the same number would fall below one — this report performs that division nowhere.
Base: 462.75 km² of occupied grid
Figure 02 · The twenty densest cells
n = 1,851 occupied cells

Ordered by the number of businesses in the cell. The base of the own-site share is the cell's own business count, not the province total.

The twenty densest grid cells
#DistrictBusinessesMost common typeOwn siteTo core
1Akdeniz398Customs brokerage 3834.2%0.4 km
2Mut340Clothing shop 367.7%107.5 km
3Erdemli295Jeweller 2914.9%35.4 km
4Tarsus281Jeweller 3517.1%27.1 km
5Silifke259Lawyer 2913.9%78.4 km
6Tarsus256Lawyer 3018.4%26.7 km
7Anamur250Clothing shop 2612.8%179.7 km
8Akdeniz236Phone / electronics shop 2430.5%0.2 km
9Silifke229Café 2020.5%78.0 km
10Akdeniz206Jeweller 2425.2%0.6 km
11Erdemli196Lawyer 2017.9%35.8 km
12Silifke184Hairdresser / barber 188.7%77.7 km
13Yenişehir182Hairdresser / barber 1526.4%3.3 km
14Yenişehir178Dental clinic 1239.3%3.7 km
15Yenişehir149Tutoring centre 1343.0%4.2 km
16Akdeniz146International shipping / freight forwarder 1537.7%0.6 km
17Akdeniz145Accountant 1430.3%0.5 km
18Yenişehir143Tutoring centre 1351.8%4.0 km
19Akdeniz138Lawyer 3532.6%0.8 km
20Silifke136Air-conditioning service 1114.0%77.3 km
The densest cell is in Akdeniz, but the second row on the list is in the centre of Mut, 107 km from the core. Density is not the property of one centre; every district centre has a core of its own.
02

Half the trade fits into 23 km²

Base: 1,851 occupied cells · 462.75 km²

Half the businesses stand in 92 cells — 5.0% of the occupied cells, 23 km² in all. The median cell holds 2 businesses; the densest holds 398.

Figure 03 · The spatial Lorenz curve of trade
n = 1,851 cells · 19,615 businesses

The horizontal axis is the cumulative share of occupied cells, sparsest first. The vertical is the cumulative share of the businesses in them. The diagonal is what an equal number of businesses in every cell would look like.

Sparsest 50%
5.3%
share of businesses
Sparsest 80%
18.2%
share of businesses
Sparsest 90%
33.3%
share of businesses
Sparsest 99%
78.5%
share of businesses
The shaded area is the Gini coefficient itself: 0.759. This curve says nothing about how empty Mersin is — a square with no business in it is not in this calculation at all. What it says is how unevenly the area trade *uses* is loaded.
Figure 04 · Hotspots × the rest of the occupied area
n = 19,615 businesses · 462.75 km²

A hotspot is a cell in the top 1% by business count; the threshold is 138 businesses. The two rows' area share and business share come from different denominators, and both are written on every row.

Hotspots
19 cells · 4.75 km²
21.5%
886.5 / km²
The rest of the occupied cells
1,832 cells · 458.00 km²
78.5%
33.6 / km²
The same two groups by area share
1.0% hotspot area99.0% the rest
The ratio between them is 26 times: the hotspots hold 886.5 businesses per square kilometre, the rest of the occupied area 33.6.
What can be said

“Trade in Mersin gathers into 2.4% of the area the businesses span; and only 1.0% of that area holds 21.5% of the businesses.” Both denominators in that sentence are written down, and neither of them is the province’s area.

03

A single corridor: 243 kilometres

First principal component · 97.0% of the variance · bearing 62.8°

97.0% of the variance in the business distribution is explained by a single direction. The standard deviation of the spread perpendicular to it is only 10.4 km; along it, 59.1 km. Mersin’s trade is laid out not over an area but along a line.

Figure 05 · The principal trade axis and its bands
n = 19,615 businesses

The red line is the first principal component of the business coordinates: the direction in which the distribution is widest. The bands around it are strips at ±1, ±2, ±5 and ±10 km perpendicular distance.

25 kmK ↑
This is not coastline data. The axis was computed from the business coordinates alone, with no map layer of any kind; that it coincides with the coastline is the finding, not the input.
Figure 06 · Share of businesses by distance from the axis
n = 19,615 businesses

Five bands by perpendicular distance from the axis. Every row's share is over the province's total business count.

0-1 km from the axisn 7,896
40.3%
1-2 km from the axisn 3,856
19.7%
2-5 km from the axisn 2,500
12.8%
5-10 km from the axisn 1,603
8.2%
over 10 km from the axisn 3,760
19.2%
40.3% of businesses are inside the axis’s 1 km band. In that same band the share with their own website is 28.6%; beyond 10 km from the axis it is 13.9%. Both rates are over their own band’s business count.
04

As you move out from the core

The rings are centred on the trade core · not an administrative centre

In the ring within 1 km of the trade core there are 354 businesses per square kilometre. At 50 km and beyond, 31. But that outer ring holds 27.8% of the businesses — the density falls, the mass does not.

Figure 07 · Distance rings from the core
n = 19,615 businesses

Two frames. On the left the 25 and 50 km rings at provincial scale; on the right the 24 km of detail around the core, on the same grid, with the 1, 2, 5 and 10 km rings. At provincial scale a 1 km radius is four pixels — and that is exactly the finding.

25 km50 km25 kmK ↑
1 km2 km5 km10 km5 kmK ↑
The square on the right is 24 km across and holds 517 cells — 27.9% of the 1,851. The four rings drawn measure a circle, not a square: within a 10 km radius of the core stand 43.9% of the businesses.
Figure 08 · Share and density per ring
n = 19,615 businesses

The dot shows the share of businesses; the number on the right is the businesses per square kilometre of that ring's footprint. Two numbers on one row, and not on the same scale.

0-1 km
8.1%
353.8 / km²
1-2 km
4.9%
94.3 / km²
2-5 km
16.8%
76.4 / km²
5-10 km
14.1%
48.4 / km²
10-25 km
7.8%
20.3 / km²
25-50 km
20.6%
36.1 / km²
50 km and beyond
27.8%
31.1 / km²
The two curves run in opposite directions. The share rises outward because the outside is large; the density falls because the same businesses are spread over a far wider footprint.
05

1,997 trade clusters, half the businesses in three

150 m single-link clustering · Gini 0.875

Putting businesses within 150 metres of one another in the same cluster gives 1,997 separate trade clusters. 1,325 of them (66.4%) hold a single business. The largest holds 7,864.

Figure 09 · The 25 largest trade clusters
n = 1,997 clusters

The circle's area is proportional to the number of businesses in the cluster — not its radius. The circle sits on the cluster's centroid; the cluster's real shape is the grid beneath it.

25 kmK ↑
Seven unbroken fabrics of 300 or more businesses hold 69.8% of all businesses, and each corresponds to a district centre. The largest one’s span is 18.2 km: this is not a bazaar but a trade fabric with no gap larger than 150 metres anywhere in it.
Figure 10 · Cluster size distribution
n = 1,997 clusters · 19,615 businesses

Two rates per row: on the left that bucket's share of all clusters, on the right its businesses' share of all businesses. Two separate bases, two separate bars.

Share of clusters · base 1,997
A single business
66.4%
2-4 businesses
23.7%
5-9 businesses
5.1%
10-24 businesses
2.9%
25-49 businesses
0.8%
50-99 businesses
0.7%
100-499 businesses
0.3%
500+ businesses
0.3%
Share of businesses · base 19,615
A single business
6.8%
2-4 businesses
6.2%
5-9 businesses
3.3%
10-24 businesses
4.2%
25-49 businesses
2.7%
50-99 businesses
4.5%
100-499 businesses
4.4%
500+ businesses
68.1%
90% of the clusters hold 13% of the businesses; the six clusters of 500 or more hold 68.1%. Half the businesses are in just three clusters.
Figure 11 · The ten largest trade clusters
n = 1,997 clusters

The span is the largest distance between any two businesses in the cluster. It is the column to read before naming anything.

The ten largest trade clusters
#DistrictBusinessesTypesSpanOwn site
1Yenişehir7,8647218.2 km31.9%
2Tarsus1,564684.0 km18.0%
3Silifke1,206662.7 km14.2%
4Erdemli1,072673.8 km17.4%
5Anamur953613.1 km14.5%
6Mut690643.1 km7.5%
7Bozyazı335522.4 km9.8%
8Gülnar148451.0 km8.1%
9Silifke136341.2 km19.9%
10Tarsus135422.1 km17.8%
The clusters carry no neighbourhood or bazaar name. The span of the cluster in Yenişehir is 18.2 km — calling it a “bazaar” would be wrong; for the 773-metre cluster in Aydıncık it would be right.
Figure 12 · Sensitivity of the clustering radius
n = 19,615 businesses

The same data under three different neighbourhood rules. The published value is 150 metres; the other two are here to show how much that value decides.

75 m
4,180
largest 1,788
150 m · published
1,997
largest 7,864
300 m
984
largest 9,205
Halve the radius and the cluster count doubles; double it and the count halves. The “1,997 clusters” in this report is not a constant of nature but the result of a setting.
06

A median 18 metres to a neighbour; a kilometre for 190

Clark-Evans R = 0.148 · z = -228.26

The median distance from a business in Mersin to its nearest neighbouring business is 18 metres. Scattered at random it would have averaged 492 metres; in fact it is 72.8 metres.

That figure is a floor and should be read as one. For some businesses Google Places gives not the front door but the centre point of a complex or a shopping centre; businesses in the same building can therefore appear at nearly zero distance. The right reading is “same building or next door”, not a metre-by-metre measurement.

Figure 13 · Distance to the nearest neighbouring business
n = 19,614 businesses

The distance to the nearest other business of any type. The base is 19,614: one business's neighbour distance could not be measured and was dropped from the base rather than counted as zero. The last two buckets are businesses with almost nobody around them.

0-25
0-25 m
businesses
25-50
25-50 m
businesses
50-100
50-100 m
businesses
100-250
100-250 m
businesses
250-500
250-500 m
businesses
500-1000
500 m - 1 km
businesses
1000+
1 km and beyond
businesses
60.6% of businesses have a neighbour within 25 metres. The median distance to the nearest competitor in the same sector is 138 metres — seven times as far.
Figure 14 · Isolated businesses, by district
n = 190 isolated businesses

Businesses with no neighbour at all within a 1,000 metre radius. Every row's base is that district's own business count.

Gülnarn 370
6.0%
Çamlıyaylan 239
4.2%
Bozyazın 512
3.1%
Aydıncıkn 249
2.8%
Mutn 961
2.3%
Unassignedn 130
1.5%
Tarsusn 2,587
1.2%
Erdemlin 1,654
1.2%
Silifken 2,057
1.1%
Toroslarn 1,493
0.9%
Anamurn 1,322
0.9%
Akdenizn 2,739
0.3%
Mezitlin 1,909
0.2%
Yenişehirn 3,393
0.1%
190 businesses (1.0%) stand alone within a kilometre. 19.0% of them have their own website — among those with neighbours that rate is 5.4 points higher.
07

Which trade leans on which

71 business types · 68 above the headline floor

Not every business type clusters the same way. Psychologists lean on one another (R = 0.076), customs brokers look almost randomly scattered (R = 0.844) — but the second is not dispersion, it is being squeezed into a single district: 88.4% of customs brokers are in Akdeniz.

Figure 15 · The clustering index of the sectors
n = 71 business types

Each tick is one business type. R is the ratio to the neighbour distance expected under complete spatial randomness inside that sector's own convex hull. The tick height carries no data; it only keeps values that land side by side countable.

Median 0.201
%0%0.25%0.5%0.75%1
The edge effect pulls R slightly upward, which works against the clustering claim; no correction was applied. Every clustering measured is at least this much.
Figure 16 · The two ends: observed and expected neighbour distance
n = 68 business types (headline floor)

The red dot is the average neighbour distance expected under a random distribution, the blue dot the observed one. The distance between them is the clustering itself.

Psychologistn 167
2,771.9%210.6%
Accountantn 248
3,382.4%287.6%
Jewellern 349
1,985.8%178.4%
Dental clinicn 272
2,670.6%241.6%
Pilates studion 64
3,991.7%363.6%
Beauty salonn 397
1,895.1%183.9%
Tyre shopn 224
3,145.9%1,125.0%
Food producer / processing plantn 468
2,606.5%989.8%
Cold storagen 55
4,000.0%2,092.5%
Customs brokeragen 112
476.8%402.2%
Axis in metres · clipped at 4,000 m
Scattered at random, psychologists’ neighbours would have been an average of 2,772 metres away; in fact they are 210.6 metres. Only the business types in the study’s own headline tier are shown: reading the tail of a 37-point sector as “the most dispersed sector in Mersin” is exactly the misquote the tiering exists to prevent.
Figure 17 · Distance to the nearest competitor in the same sector
n = 68 business types (headline floor)

Median metres, the closest fourteen first. This is a distance, not a rate; the axis is in metres.

Lawyer
n 357
22 m
p25 4 m
Jeweller
n 349
28 m
p25 10 m
Customs brokerage
n 112
35 m
p25 11 m
Clothing shop
n 488
44 m
p25 22 m
Pharmacy
n 487
56 m
p25 16 m
Accountant
n 248
56 m
p25 20 m
International shipping / freight forwarder
n 159
56 m
p25 19 m
Shoe shop
n 346
59 m
p25 26 m
Boat / yacht tour operator
n 52
64 m
p25 18 m
Car repair shop
n 523
66 m
p25 24 m
Psychologist
n 167
69 m
p25 18 m
Phone / electronics shop
n 813
71 m
p25 30 m
Furniture shop
n 479
74 m
p25 30 m
Beauty salon
n 397
76 m
p25 27 m
For lawyers the median is 22 metres: a lawyer’s nearest colleague is, in most cases, in the same building. The province-wide median is 138 metres.
Figure 18 · Sector share in the hotspot cells
n = 68 business types (headline floor)

Every row's base is that business type's own business count. The red line is the province-wide figure: 21.5% of businesses are in hotspot cells.

Lawyern 357
60.8%
Jewellern 349
54.2%
Accountantn 248
54.0%
Customs brokeragen 112
50.0%
Shoe shopn 346
44.8%
Clothing shopn 488
44.3%
Language schooln 68
44.1%
Driving schooln 146
43.2%
International shipping / freight forwardern 159
42.1%
Psychologistn 167
38.9%
Insurance agencyn 312
37.2%
Beauty salonn 397
34.3%
Dental clinicn 272
32.4%
Ship agencyn 61
31.2%
60.8% of lawyers are in the 19 cells covering 1.0% of the occupied area. For car repair shops the same rate is 1.9% — in the same province, on the same grid.
08

Digital presence clusters spatially

Moran's I = 0.458 · z = 10.65 · n = 226 cells

The share of businesses with their own website is not scattered randomly across the map: neighbouring cells hold similar shares. That means knowing one cell’s share carries information about its neighbour’s — and says nothing at all about why.

Figure 19 · Own-website share, cell by cell
n = 226 cells · each holding at least 20 businesses

The ink on this map is red and Figure 01's is blue — deliberately. That map paints a count, this one a rate; if the two ramps were the same, a dense cell would read as a digital one. The pale grey ground is the 1,625 cells no rate could be calculated for.

25 kmK ↑
Cells with fewer than twenty businesses are left out: a cell with three businesses can only produce 0%, 33%, 67% or 100%, and putting those on a map would be drawing noise as a finding. The scale is cut into five bands; the province-wide figure is 24.3%.
0% – 10% · 38 cells
10% – 20% · 56 cells
20% – 30% · 58 cells
30% – 40% · 44 cells
40% and above · 30 cells
Figure 20 · Distance from the core × own website
n = 226 cells

Each circle is a cell; its size is the number of businesses in it. The horizontal axis is logarithmic, because half the cells sit within 10 km.

%0%20%40%60%80Province-wide 24.3%0,1 km1 km10 km100 kmDISTANCE FROM THE TRADE CORESHARE OF BUSINESSES WITH THEIR OWN SITE
The Spearman rank correlation is -0.539. No curve was drawn: section 10 sets out why this relationship is not causation, and a fit line on the chart would quietly take that sentence back.
Figure 21 · Cell density × own website
n = 226 cells

The same 226 cells, this time against density rather than distance. The horizontal axis is logarithmic again.

%0%20%40%60%802050100200400BUSINESSES IN THE CELLSHARE OF BUSINESSES WITH THEIR OWN SITE
Spearman -0.017 — a value this close to zero means the number of businesses in a cell says nothing about that cell’s digital presence. Density does not explain it; distance looks as though it might. The next section sets out why that is not enough.
Figure 22 · Own-website share by ring
n = 19,615 businesses

Every row's base is that ring's own business count. The red line is the province-wide figure: 24.3%.

0-1 kmn 1,592
31.2%
1-2 kmn 967
27.9%
2-5 kmn 3,285
32.4%
5-10 kmn 2,761
35.2%
10-25 kmn 1,520
31.3%
25-50 kmn 4,047
18.5%
50 km and beyondn 5,443
13.7%
In the ring within 1 km of the core it is 31.2%; at 50 km and beyond, 13.7%. The gap between them is 17.5 percentage points. There is no regular gradient across the first five rings — the break comes after 25 km.
09

29.7 points between Yenişehir and Çamlıyayla

13 districts · base: each district's own business count

The largest difference between districts is not in density but in digital presence. Between the densest and the sparsest district there is a factor of 7.1 in businesses per square kilometre of footprint; in the own-website share the gap is 29.7 percentage points.

Figure 23 · Own-website share by district
n = 19,485 businesses

Every row's base is that district's own business count. The 130 businesses whose district could not be assigned are outside this figure.

Yenişehirn 3,393
38.5%
Akdenizn 2,739
33.7%
Mezitlin 1,909
29.9%
Toroslarn 1,493
23.8%
Tarsusn 2,587
20.5%
Erdemlin 1,654
17.8%
Silifken 2,057
15.9%
Anamurn 1,322
14.9%
Aydıncıkn 249
11.2%
Gülnarn 370
10.8%
Mutn 961
9.6%
Bozyazın 512
9.6%
Çamlıyaylan 239
8.8%
All three districts at the top of the ranking are within 11 km of the core; four of the five at the bottom are more than 100 km away. That is a relationship, not an explanation.
Figure 24 · District geography
n = 19,485 businesses

The density denominator is the footprint: the total area of the 500 m cells that district put a business in. Administrative area was never used in this study.

Trade geography by district
DistrictBusinessesShareFootprint/ km²SpreadTo core
Yenişehir3,39317.3%39.75 km²85.42.2 km4.4 km
Akdeniz2,73914.0%70.50 km²38.96.2 km1.0 km
Tarsus2,58713.2%69.50 km²37.25.7 km26.7 km
Silifke2,05710.5%58.25 km²35.311.8 km77.9 km
Mezitli1,9099.7%37.25 km²51.22.9 km10.1 km
Erdemli1,6548.4%57.00 km²29.08.4 km35.6 km
Toroslar1,4937.6%51.25 km²29.14.0 km3.0 km
Anamur1,3226.7%29.25 km²45.231.9 km179.3 km
Mut9614.9%31.75 km²30.312.8 km107.5 km
Bozyazı5122.6%25.50 km²20.128.1 km166.8 km
Gülnar3701.9%26.75 km²13.828.3 km121.0 km
Aydıncık2491.3%12.25 km²20.320.4 km135.9 km
Çamlıyayla2391.2%19.75 km²12.17.2 km40.7 km
The “spread” column is the standard distance: how far a district’s businesses scatter, on average, from their own centroid. In Anamur it is 31.9 km, in Yenişehir 2.2 km.

Not one density number in this table was divided by a district’s administrative area. Had we done that, we would have shown the difference between Çamlıyayla and Yenişehir as hundreds of times larger, and what we measured would not be trade but where the district boundaries happen to run.

10

A map does not show causation

A single cross-section · no external geodata · 72 business types

This report’s strongest-looking finding is also its most easily misread: as you move away from the core, the share of businesses with their own website falls. The rank correlation is -0.539 and the gap between the first and last ring is 17.5 points. That is a relationship.

The same pattern is produced by the composition of sectors alone, even if distance had no effect at all. In the centre there are lawyers, accountants and customs brokers; in the countryside car washes and tyre shops. Those two groups already differ in website ownership. Separating how much each carries would need the same businesses on two different dates, or a comparison holding sector constant; this study has neither.

What this data supports
  • That trade is squeezed into a very small part of the area the businesses span, and that this squeeze can be measured with the Gini, the Lorenz curve and the hotspot share.
  • That 97% of the variance in the business distribution is explained by a single direction, and that this direction falls out of the data itself.
  • That sectors separate spatially: the gap between the most clustered and the most dispersed business type is more than tenfold.
  • That the share of businesses with their own website is not spatially random; neighbouring cells hold similar shares.
What this data does not support
  • That distance from the core lowers digital presence — a single cross-section tests no causation, and the composition of sectors produces the same pattern.
  • That the clusters have grown over time or that the core has shifted — that needs panel data.
  • That an empty cell means there is no trade there — the sample is limited to 72 business types.
  • That the densest block is “Mersin's commercial centre” — that is a sampling definition, not an administrative one.
Moran’s I = 0.458 says that digital presence clusters spatially. It does not say why it clusters.
n = 226 cells · z = 10.65

Limitations

A single cross-section cannot measure growth.
Whether the clusters have grown over time, or whether the core has shifted, cannot be tested with this data. A repeat of the study will produce the panel data that can measure it.
The sample is limited to 72 business types.
A cluster of a sector outside the scope does not appear on the map at all. An empty cell does not mean “there is no trade there”; it means “none of these 72 types is there”.
Dense areas may be saturated.
Places Text Search returns at most 60 results per query. In very dense areas the coverage is cut at that limit, which understates density — so the densest cells may be denser than what is written here.
Coordinate precision varies from business to business.
Businesses inside a shopping centre or an office block can fall on a single centre point. That pulls the nearest-neighbour distances down and makes differences under 100 metres uninterpretable.
The clusters have no names.
The clusters carry no neighbourhood or bazaar name. The largest are formed by chaining and represent not a bazaar but the unbroken trade fabric of a district centre; any naming must be verified by hand.
A convex hull is not a density denominator.
Google's district field misfiles a few businesses per district — a mobile roadside-assistance listing registered to Akdeniz appears 150 km west along the coast. A single point like that multiplies the hull tenfold; it adds one cell to the footprint. The hull appears in this report only as an indicator of spread.
District shares are not economic shares.
Because the same query effort was spent in every district, these numbers measure shares of the businesses in the sample, not the economic size of the districts.
The distance-to-digital relationship is not causation.
That the share of businesses with their own site falls as you move away from the centre does not show that distance lowers digital presence. The composition of sectors produces the same pattern: lawyers and customs brokers in the centre, car washes in the countryside.

Citation rules

These six rules are not a matter of style. Each is here because breaking it changes what the number means.

  1. 01Density is always given with an explicit denominator; the province's area is never used.
  2. 02Do not say “Mersin's commercial centre”; say “the densest trade block in the sample”.
  3. 03The relationship between distance and digital presence is a relationship; no causation is claimed.
  4. 04When districts are compared the base is that district's business footprint; it is neither its administrative area nor its convex hull.
  5. 05Differences in distance under 100 metres are not interpreted; a Places coordinate is not building-precise.
  6. 06The clusters carry no neighbourhood or bazaar name; any naming must be verified by hand.

The method, briefly

  1. 01UniverseThe data set of the Mersin / State of Digital 2026 study: the 19,615 local businesses visible as active on Google and carrying a coordinate. There is no record without a coordinate; coverage is 100%.
  2. 02ProjectionA local plane projection (plate carrée), origin 36.668 / 34.292. All distances are in metres. Published distances are calculated with the haversine formula; the grid and the clustering use plane distance.
  3. 03The gridA square grid 500 m on a side. The density denominator is the area of the occupied cells alone; Mersin's area enters no calculation. The hotspot threshold is the top 1% of businesses per cell: 138 businesses.
  4. 04Clustering150 m single-link clustering. Single-business clusters are not counted as “noise” but reported as clusters of their own. Results for half the radius (75 m) and twice it (300 m) are published in Figure 12.
  5. 05Sector thresholdSector comparisons are limited to the 68 business types in the study's own “headline” tier. Sectors with fewer points appear in the distribution figures but never become a headline at either end.
  6. 06District assignmentThe administrative_area_level_2 field in Google's address components. The 130 records that could not be assigned were not estimated; they were kept in a bucket of their own, outside the district tables.
Businesses with no district assigned
130
not estimated
Businesses without a coordinate
0
coverage 100%

Sources

  1. 01Google Places API (New) business profilesThe primary data source; name, address, coordinates, primary type (primaryType), business status and the website field. Fieldwork 2026·08·25. No extra API call was made for this report; every map was produced from the existing coordinates.developers.google.com
  2. 02Nixeny Dijital · Mersin / State of Digital 2026The same universe, the same field date. The 19,615-business base, the district assignment and the definition of “own website” this report uses come from that study. There, location was an auxiliary field; here it is the subject itself.nixeny.com
  3. 03External geodata: noneThis is not a source but the absence of one, and it stands here because it changes how the report is read. Population, district area, coastline and the road network do not enter this study. The silhouette of Mersin on the maps was not drawn; it is a by-product of where the businesses are.
  4. 04The formulas usedGini: 2·Σ(i·xᵢ)/(n·Σx) − (n+1)/n over the ascending vector. Lorenz: 101 cumulative points in 1% steps. Clark-Evans: the ratio of the observed mean nearest-neighbour distance to the value expected under complete spatial randomness inside the sector's own convex hull. Moran's I: queen contiguity over the occupied cells. Principal axis: the first principal component of the coordinates. Clustering: 150 m single-link, plane distance.

No area, distance or density calculation in this report was compared against an external map layer. An axis that coincides with the coastline is a finding as long as it is not verified against coastline data; verify it and it becomes a circle. All that is shared with Mersin / State of Digital 2026 is the universe and the field date.

Colophon

Nixeny Dijital - Mersin / Trade Geography 2026 · Version 01 · Fieldwork 2026·08·25 · Published 2026·08·27

Conducted and published by Nixeny Dijital, Mersin. Data collection, projection, spatial statistics, map production and report design are Nixeny’s own. The universe and the digital presence classification are shared with the Mersin / State of Digital 2026 study. The maps are produced on the server for this page; no map service and no external layer is used.

The method, the raw data sets, the grid file and the verification records are shared on request. For corrections and questions: info@nixeny.com

Citation

How to cite this study

Nixeny Dijital (2026). Nixeny Dijital - Mersin / Trade Geography 2026. https://nixeny.com/en/research/mersin-trade-geography-2026

Deck and PDF

The slides and the PDF are shared on request

A presentation deck, a print-ready PDF, the count behind every percentage and the method files all exist for this study. They are shared with press, academia and public institutions on condition of attribution.

Copyright and Terms of Use

© 2026 Nixeny Dijital. All rights reserved.

The texts, analyses, charts, tables, images and compiled data outputs produced for this study were prepared by Nixeny Dijital. Neither the whole nor a substantial part of the content may be copied, republished or presented under another study's name without written permission.

Limited quotation from the study is permitted in news reports, articles and other publications. In that case the source must be named explicitly as “Nixeny Dijital — Nixeny Dijital - Mersin / Trade Geography 2026” and an active link given to this page.

Use and permission requests: kivanctasci@nixeny.cominfo@nixeny.com